QnA Schengen Visa
What is a "remonstrance letter" for an appeal?
Outbound Team
A remonstrance letter is a special type of appeal letter used specifically when your Schengen visa is refused by a German embassy or consulate.
It is essentially a formal request asking the German authorities to reconsider your visa decision — but it must follow Germany’s strict appeal rules.
Here’s what it means and how it works 👇
🇩🇪 What is a Remonstrance Letter?
A remonstrance is a written appeal submitted to the German Embassy, explaining why the refusal was incorrect and why your application should be approved upon review.
Unlike a regular appeal in other Schengen countries, Germany requires the appeal to be sent directly to the visa section, not to a court.
📄 What Your Remonstrance Letter Must Include
A strong remonstrance letter should clearly address:
• The exact reasons listed in your refusal letter
• Why the embassy’s assessment may be incorrect or incomplete
• Additional documents that support your case
• Clarifications or explanations for any concerns
• A polite, factual, and structured argument
Because this is a formal legal-style document, it needs to be detailed, precise, and professional.
📝 Required Format
A remonstrance letter should contain:
• Your full name, passport number, and contact details
• Date of refusal and application reference number
• Point-by-point response to refusal reasons
• Additional evidence or corrected documents
• Your signature
Some embassies require the letter to be written in German, though English is accepted in Singapore in many cases.
⏳ Processing Time
A remonstrance can take 4–12 weeks because the embassy reopens your case, reviews your file, and may consult authorities in Germany.
During this time, you generally cannot reapply unless you withdraw the remonstrance.
💡 Outbound Singapore Tip:
We help clients write clear, structured, and persuasive remonstrance letters that address the embassy’s concerns directly. This greatly improves your chances of overturning the refusal — especially if the decision was unfair or based on misunderstanding.